Archive for March, 2008

boy, i feel like ass.

i’m not sure what i did to piss crom off - maybe it’s the muttering “crom” all the time thing - but the last two weeks have been pretty obnoxious. on the plus side, i’m working again, which is nice. although i’ve got this stupid javascript/jsp issue that i really should have done by tomorrow, except a) everyone who lives here that isn’t feline has picked up some kind of cold/flu thing in the last week or so, and b) it’s currently my turn at the moment. temperature at 100.5 last time i checked, so that’s not too bad. not doing much for the productivity though. plus i’m flying solo for the next couple days, starting tonight. so it looks like we’re in for a fun couple of days at least here. and taking days off the first couple of weeks on the job seems iffy. i remembered yesrerday i haven’t even told them yet about taking that week in may off.

and you know, the whole appeal of crom is that the cranky son of a bitch doesn’t listen to a damn thing anyone says anyway. so what the fuck?

what the situation calls for is, thus, fairly obvious: i need to watch a hitchcock movie. and i haven’t seen “rope” in a long time. and the bad guy is kind of the anti-jimmy stewart, like his evil twin or something, which i think adds something to an already fine feature (see: hitchcock). and, serendipitously enough (i hope that’s a word. it should be, anyway) i have on my dvr one “rope” directed by alfred hitchcock.

see what happens? i get a job and everything goes right to hell. on the other hand, if i could get lottery tickets delivered while watching “rope,” i’m pretty sure that would solve all of my problems.

Comments

skree-gah!

okay, this is just awesome. it was linked from mefi a few days ago; i started watching it yesterday, and just spent 20 minutes watching two eagles making repairs to their hugaceous nest in a snowstorm on the coast of maine.

you know, internet, you’re pretty bitchin’. yes you are!

Comments

homeowner? don’t you mean… NAZI?!?!?!

this is pretty irritating right here. it never ceases to amaze me that people who really should know better insist on turning the city’s unwillingness to really commit to affordable housing (while letting developers throw up new skyscraper lofts left right and center, of course) into some absurd us vs them dynamic, with the “them” being those rotten greedy bastards who want to actually own a home, or at least a piece of one, in one of the best places in the world to live, and maybe have the kind of security for their family that the tenant advocates demand for the renters they claim to represent. i know! we’ll outlaw condos and tics altogether! that will fix it! then no one will ever be evicted again! plus you have to love the “i know the *real* numbers” argument there. proof? evidence? who needs that (especially when what there is completely contradicts my argument) when i have an opinion! don quixote, call for you on line two…

it’s a real problem, and the real solution is for the city to make real affordable housing. sure some developers won’t get quite as rich as they would otherwise, but that seems preferable to punishing the few people who are able to scrape enough together to try to put down roots in a city they love, and not have to live with the uncertainty of some lunatic landlord or management company ready to yank the rug out first chance they get.

Comments

7 years too late

but’s it’s nice someone has finally noticed.

Comments

quote of the day

“The great thing about Orbs is that a lot of people believe with all their might that when they die there’s a possibility their spirits turn into flash photography artifacts.”

(can you tell i’m bored? that’s not even from today, technically. although “today” is kind of a meaningless construct anyway. but that’s not as interesting as punching dave sim in the mouth would be, so i’ll leave it at that.)

i think i’m being stupid about firefox tab usage, or else something else is making my fingers hurt.

Comments

so that’s what a “spine” looks like…

nice to see once every decade or so. maybe next they can debate whether or not the president and his friends can break the laws whenever they want, too. a few years ago one might have thought that sort of thing to be obvious (remember those halcyon days of “rule of law” being spouted about while 10s of millions of dollars were spent on getting to the bottom of stuff that didn’t even have anything to do with, you know… running the country? ah, those were the days).

Comments

the itunes store sucks ass

no wonder people just pirate shit, if this is the “good” alternative. what a joke. what a sloppy, awkward, unintuitive, backwards-ass stupid, DRM-ed up the bunghole joke. as i say this i’m setting up another p2p client. fuck you, apple.

Comments (3)

it’s rare one gets to say “i agree with the ragin’ cajun”

and yet, there it is. how odd.

Comments

science!

this is just pretty damn bitchin any way you look at it. just imagine if we actually really dedicated the money and resources to science that we throw away every single day on… oh, never mind. that part is too depressing right now.

but science! that part is bitchin.

Comments

an excellent example of something you don’t need to have an opinion about…

because if you do you are almost certainly dead fucking wrong, and quite possibly an idiot besides. there are as many examples as there are relationships, and trying to figure out what the hell is going on from the inside is usually impossible. from the outside? forget about it. who knows why people do things? and, of vastly more importance, what the hell business is it of random hypocritical strangers eager to indulge in some easy self-righteous condemnation, to pass judgement? and yes, hypocrites. anyone who castigates anyone else’s reasoning or motivations or whatever as far as their relationships are involved is a hypocrite, period. (of course we’re talking about situations where everyone involved is a consenting adult, which in this case specifically i think we can all agree is certainly the case; the absurd rush to an ignorant judgement seems to mostly involve WHY one or another of the parties is consenting to be a party to the relationship at all.) the louder and more indignant the castigations, the more assured the hypocrisy. there are so many examples of this dynamic, so many instances of someone publically decrying the lack of moral fortitude and/or personal dignity required to be as fine an example of a human being as the person doing the judging, that finding any number of examples to illustrate this dynamic presents zero challenge to anyone actually interested in things like honesty and dignity and the importance of conducting one’s self in an appropriate manner. which, of course, almost no one is, if the typical inane, brutally stupid reaction of the nattering classes and the bloggy clowns is any indication.

it’s none of your fucking business, so keep your nose out of it, moron. if you want to attack the governor’s own blatantly self-serving hypocrisy in going after “sex-rings” in the first place and then indulging himself, fine. in my opinion the mistake was the first move and not the second - again, we’re not talking about women being forced into slavery because they chose the wrong people to smuggle them across the border, or were in the wrong place at the wrong time, or any number of real, horrific, indefensible crimes of a similar nature that should be stomped right off the face of the earth - we’re talking about consenting adults. if the governor or your neighbor or your high school civics teacher wants to pay another consenting adult - man, woman, in between, whatever, for sex, so what?

you know, here’s a newsflash: puritanism sucks. it’s a dead end, culturally, civically, legally, period. it’s like continually insisting that the sun will rise in the west tomorrow because YOU really REALLY think it should. and you almost certainly think that because someone told you to think that. and that someone either a) has a vested interest in making you believe it, b) is clinically insane, or the most likely scenario: c) all of the above. then - and i really think this is the attractive part for the kind of people we’re discussing here - it’s time to punish punish punish! time to punish people for noticing that lunatic wishing in the face of vast amounts of undeniable evidence to the contrary, still did not come to pass. again. but hey, check back tomorrow. just don’t talk about it or mention it to the wrong people, because then it’s stake burning season. again.

Comments