proving a negative

It’s amusing to see the Clinton folks (among others) hitting Obama over his lack of “legislative accomplishments.” I’ve got an accomplishment for you: how about not letting mindless hysteria and horrendous judgement become convincing arguments for rolling over on your constitutional responsibilities, and then claiming later to have been hoodwinked by what might be the dumbest, most arrogant, most blatantly, obviously corrupt administration since Boss Hogg? Does that count?

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.